Results for „Spa"
36 results
News
- Title protection for newspaper section "Stimmt's"?
- Is recommendation advertising spam unfair competition?
- Costs for internet subscription services must be clearly recognisable
- Consent to telephone marketing through double 'opt-in' procedure?
- Terms and Conditions clause ineffective despite reiteration of statutory wording?
- Liability for anti-competitive e-mail advertising in outsourcing
- Opening offers with price comparison without time limitation impermissible
- €1,300 for Tatort opening sequence is sufficient
- E-mail from referral function is anti-competitive spam!
- Three Banks See Red
- Advertising in Auto-Reply E-Mail Violation of Right of Personality?
- Trade mark "VITA" for insurance descriptive?
- Scope of the obligation to cease and desist regarding e-mail advertising
- Are Auto-Reply Emails Spam?
- Trade mark infringement of "Red Bull" by "Fucking Red"?
- Violation of celebrity hairdresser through report in Bild newspaper?
- Risk of confusion between "Mc Donalds" and "Mäc Spice"?
- The dispute over red continues…
- Apple guarantees contrary to competition law?
- Violation of personality rights through auto-reply email?
- "Spa" – generic term for cosmetics?
- WhatsApp must translate terms and conditions
- Red colour mark retained by Sparkasse!
- Eventim's service fees unlawful
- Advertising for a current account misleading?
- Spam can be expensive
- Not so sparkling: Opening a beverage as a sound mark
- GDPR and Compensation for Pain and Suffering: Federal Court of Justice (BGH) Rejects Claim Based on Unsolicited Marketing Email
- Court of Justice of the European Union (EuGH) ruling: "Buy now, pay later" in online advertising constitutes a sales promotion
- No hidden risks in public construction contracts! – Transparency as a shield for bidders in procurement proceedings
- Distortion of competition through staff changes must be examined – Court of Justice of the European Union (EuGH) quashes General Court (EuG) judgment on satellite procurement
- A bike-sharing tender that violates the transparency requirement in the procurement procedure is set aside by the BayObLG.
- Price marking with consequences: Higher Regional Court (OLG) Nuremberg prohibits unclear "−30%" labelling on perishable cheese
- The preservation designation in the development plan is confirmed by the Higher Regional Court (OVG) Lüneburg as sufficiently determined in spatial terms.
- Violation of parking space requirement does not confer defensive rights on neighbours – duty of consideration specified
- Regional Court Cologne (LG Köln) rules on pricing in REWE Bonus loyalty programme