Results for „Wettbewerbsrecht"
38 results
News
- Publication of private football films on hartplatzhelden.de prohibited
- Use of the word mark "DAX" for index-related financial products
- Is advertising for counterfeit branded perfume anticompetitive?
- Injunction against imitation of illuminated paving stones?
- Use of product symbols unfair?
- Obstruction by Screen Scraping?
- Imitation of luxury handbags
- Peculiar Shoes
- Chocolate biscuit presentation at a trade fair
- Prescription-only medicines without a prescription?
- No protection against imitation for bongs
- Pharmacist advertising in medical practice permitted?
- The Gold Bears – Lindt wins against Haribo
- Penny may Pippi!
- Facebook is not permitted to offer 'Find Friends'
- Advertising with "Hollywood" lettering – permissible?
- Unfair imitation of shoe soles?
- Medical services at fixed prices?
- Misleading Advertising for a Complete Kitchen?
- Puma vs. Dolce & Gabbana: Dispute Over Shower Slides
- No liability for customer reviews on Amazon
- Advertising with telehealth services and fictional specialist title
- Is "Manufaktur" permissible in a company name?
- Property Value Calculator – Valuation in Two Minutes?
- Advertising with test result 'Excellent' misleading?
- Court of Justice of the European Union (EuGH) ruling on exclusive distribution rights with significant practical implications for distribution law
- FOCUS physician seals in court: Higher Regional Court (OLG) Munich declares the seals "TOP-Mediziner" and "FOCUS-Empfehlung" permissible with clear decision
- Federal Court of Justice (BGH) decision: Former pharmaceutical price binding cannot be applied to EU mail-order pharmacies – mail-order pharmacies are permitted to grant bonuses
- Prohibition by the Higher Regional Court (OLG) Cologne – The use of "apple leather" as a product designation for vegan dog accessories is misleading because "apple leather" is not leather.
- Federal Court of Justice (BGH): PAYBACK points on the purchase of hearing aids are impermissible – the value limit for promotional gifts must not exceed €1 even for medical devices
- Urgency in emergency proceedings: Higher Regional Court of Schleswig sends a clear message – delay leads to loss of legal protection, even in the Meta case
- Voucher advertising for pharmacies: limits of medicinal product advertising and liability under § 945 ZPO
- €25 Voucher for e-Prescriptions Prohibited – Higher Regional Court of Karlsruhe Tightens the Limits of Discount Advertising under the Medicines Advertising Act
- Federal Court of Justice (BGH) on withdrawal information: what matters is the intelligibility of consumer information
- Federal Court of Justice (BGH): Advertising for Medical Cannabis – Intermediary Platforms in Focus of HWG
- Federal Court of Justice (BGH) on agent liability under the UWG: companies are liable for unfair competition violations of their advertising partners
- Marking influencer advertising: press trip instead of honorarium – nevertheless advertising